Survival and arrhythmia risk in medicare patients with icd generator changes in the ncdr icd registry based on left ventricular ejection fraction at the time of generator change

Aún no traducido Aún no traducido
Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaCirculation
Año 2019
Introduction: There is presently uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of performing an ICD generator change (GC) for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and an original primary prevention indication. Hypothesis: Survival rates and arrhythmia risk in Medicare patients undergoing an ICD GC would be influenced by whether the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved to greater than 35% at the time of GC. Methods: Survival was evaluated in patients with Medicare coverage (age ≥ 65 years) with an original (pre-ICD) primary prevention indication undergoing an ICD GC (ORIG-PP-ICD-GC) from the NCDR ICD Registry Version 2 (excluding cardiac resynchronization therapy devices) relative to a control group without ICDs from clinical trials and registries. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 9,643 ORIG-PP-ICD-GC patients, 68% still had LVEF≤35%, and 32% had improved LVEF>35% at the time of GC. The frequency of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock therapies prior to GC was similar in those with LVEF≤35% (20.8%) and LVEF >35% at GC (19.6%). Improved LVEF>35% at GC was associated with greater unadjusted survival (p< 0.0001; Figure), consistent with a more favorable Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM-D) risk score with LVEF>35% versus LVEF≤35% (-0.30 versus 0.34; p<0.0001). In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for SHFM-D and arrhythmia risk, ORIG-PP-ICD-GC patients as a whole had a modestly increased mortality risk versus 13,797 control patients without ICDs (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.22, p< 0.0001). Conclusions: In this Medicare cohort with an original primary prevention ICD indication, improvement in LVEF to over 35% at GC was reported in about a third of patients and was associated with better survival overall but similar rates of ICD therapies between the initial ICD implant and GC. Overall survival after an ORIG-PP-ICD-GC was lower than expected.
Epistemonikos ID: 3c77fa81dd616cda889a20faf5fa72cc4c73627e
First added on: Feb 11, 2025