Autores
»
O'Neil BH, Cainap C, Van Cutsem E, Gorbunova V, Karapetis CS, Berlin J, Goldberg RM, Qin Q, Qian J, Ricker JL, Fischer J, McKee MD, Carlson DM, Kim TW -Más
Categoría
»
Estudio primario
Revista»CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
Año
»
2014
In this phase II trial of 148 patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), we investigated the efficacy and safety of oral linifanib (7.5 or 12.5 mg), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families, or bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) in combination with mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid). Patients receiving linifanib did not experience a survival advantage.
Background: Although CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, second-line CRC treatment is limited. In this trial we examined the efficacy and safety of linifanib, an oral, potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families, with mFOLFOX6, compared with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6, in previously treated metastatic CRC. Patients and Methods: One hundred forty-eight patients with advanced CRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine or irinotecan received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, intravenous), low-dose linifanib (7.5 mg), or high-dose linifanib (12.5 mg), with mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: No statistically significant differences in PFS occurred between bevacizumab and linifanib doses (low, hazard ratio [HR], 1.453 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.830-2.539]; high, HR, 1.257 [95% CI, 0.672-2.351]). Median OS values were similar for bevacizumab and high-dose linifanib (bevacizumab, 16.5 months [95% CI, 13.0-not available]; high-dose linifanib, 16.4 months [95% CI, 11.9-21.7]; low-dose linifanib, 12.0 months [95% CI, 10.1-13.0]). ORRs were similar (bevacizunnab, 34.7% [95% CI, 21.7-49.6]; low-dose linifanib, 24.0% [95% CI, 13.1-38.2]; high-dose linifanib, 22.4% [95% CI, 11.8-36.6]). Median cycles of 5-fluorouracil were reduced in the linifanib arms, versus the bevacizumab arm. Grade 3/4 adverse event occurrences were more frequent with linifanib. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypothyroidism, and thrombocytopenia were more common with high-dose linifanib than bevacizumab. Conclusion: Combining linifanib with mFOLFOX6 as a second-line treatment for metastatic CRC did not improve PFS, radiographic findings, or duration of response versus bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Epistemonikos ID: 2939130aedb98b8a2cfb6d452d55d426318defa8
First added on: Nov 02, 2017