Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

Machine translation Machine translation
此檔案並非最近版本

觀看最近期版本

类别 Systematic review
期刊Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year 2004
引言:肩部问题对于物理治疗师的转诊负责约10%,是肩峰下病理最常见的肩峰下冲击综合症,占44-65%。然而,这种疾病中物理治疗的有效性仍然是讨论的话题。目的:确定物理治疗对于肩峰下冲击综合征(SIS)患者的疗效。方法:对PubMed / Medline,B-on,SciELO和PEDro的计算机数据库进行研究,以确定评估SIS中各种物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验。结果:本次评估包括10项涉及823例患者的研究,平均分类法为PEDro评分7.1级。从本次评估的研究中,9人通过手动技术和治疗练习评估了物理治疗,并且考虑了应用物理因素。结论:本系统综述中发现的证据表明,物理治​​疗在治疗SIS方面起着至关重要的作用,即通过手动治疗和治疗练习。使用物理代理显示了一些改进。从研究开始,我们提出了关于物理治疗的新研究与长期影响的相关性。
Epistemonikos ID: fe2274bfd392582e6c6c4727d62559eda5869c02
First added on: Mar 09, 2012
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use

Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English, Español

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use