Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: the case of influenza immunization.

Machine translation Machine translation
作者 O'Connor AM, Pennie RA, Dales RE -More
类别 Primary study
期刊Journal of clinical epidemiology
Year 1996
連結 Pubmed, DOI
目的：探讨用积极或消极的框架来描述流感疫苗的好处和副作用，对患者的期望，决定，决策冲突，和报道的副作用的影响。 方法：292以前未接受免疫接种的慢性呼吸道疾病或心脏病患者被随机分配接受被诬陷的效益/风险信息：（1）积极的百分比仍然流感有没有疫苗的副作用，或（2）负面收购流感有疫苗副作用的比例。问卷调查引起的期望，决策和决策的冲突。疫苗3天后，打电话的局部和全身副作用和旷工的自我报告。 结果：两组有类似的免疫接种率和决策冲突的分数。正面框架组降低疫苗的副作用，全身副作用少，旷工少（P <0.05）和更现实的期望。 结论：在医护人员以往的研究相比，取景也不会影响病人的决定，可能是由于患者的流感并发症的风险较高和更大的愿望，遵循建议的认识。描述副作用的概率时使用底片的普遍做法，可能需要重新审视，考虑到其对自我报告的副作用和旷工的有害影响。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: cb792c4c2d89ffb026e0b97fe985293ec1b9cc6a
First added on: Dec 31, 2011
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use