Retrospective cross sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants.

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Primary study
期刊Journal of endodontics
Year 2006
連結 Pubmed, DOI
初始根管治疗和单齿的置换植入物都是可行的治疗选择，但各种成功率一直在报告每个治疗模式。这项研究比较了196植入修复体和患者匹配的196非手术初期根管治疗（NSRCT）牙齿四种可能outcomes-成功，生存，生存与后续治疗干预和失败。使用Pearson卡（2）测试这两种分类协会（内植入与和结果）交叉分类/表格进行分析。多歧回归似然比检验被用来测试协会牙齿的位置和结果。结果是如下的植入物和NSRCT成果，分别为：成功73.5％和82.1％;生存与不干预2.6％和8.2％;生存干预17.9％和3.6％;和失败6.1％和6.1％。在口腔中恢复的位置没有影响的结果。这项研究表明，恢复了根管治疗的牙齿和单牙种植修复也有类似的失败率，虽然种植组表现出了更长的平均和中位数时间的功能和术后并发症，需要后续治疗干预的发生率较高。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: 9a1cd1d53d53f53d63c7fc747bf43b53e7233ea0
First added on: Oct 27, 2014
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use