Current indications of low-level laser therapy in plastic surgery: a review.

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Systematic review
期刊Photomedicine and laser surgery
Year 2015
連結 Pubmed, DOI
目的：本文系统评价随机对照试验（RCT）的文献和荟萃分析的目的是比较口服酮洛芬与布洛芬和/或双氯芬酸的疗效。方法：根据Cochrane协作指南对文献进行系统评估。搜索仅限于2011年6月在Medline和Embase数据库中公布的随机临床试验，并比较口服酮洛芬（50-200mg /天）与布洛芬（600-1800mg /天）或双氯芬酸（75- 150毫克/天）。结果：共有13项RCT涉及898例患者符合纳入标准：8例比较酮洛芬与布洛芬，5例比较酮洛芬与双氯芬酸。荟萃分析的结果显示有利于酮洛芬的功效差异有统计学意义。酮洛芬和合并的布洛芬/双氯芬酸数据之间的差异在平均加权大小效应的所有点估计上也具有统计学意义（0.459,95％CI 0.33-0.58; p = 0.00）。所有点估计，酮洛芬的显着优于双氯芬酸（平均值= 0.422; 95％CI 0.19-0.65; p = 0.0007）和布洛芬（平均值= 0.475; 95％CI 0.32-0.62; p = 0.0000）。在任何荟萃分析中，分析的功效结果的异质性无统计学意义。结论口服酮洛芬缓解中重度疼痛，改善功能状态和一般状况的疗效明显优于布洛芬和/或双氯芬酸。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: 56654e024a7edce9756cd28c31aa2e129ee82416
First added on: May 11, 2015
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use