Efficacy and cardiovascular tolerability of extended dialysis in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled study

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Primary study
期刊AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Year 2004
摘要:背景:延期的透析是的一个肾功能的更换的的治疗方法,理论上提供在的密集的的监护病房(ICU)中的的作者:既间歇式和连续疗法的的的优势的越来越多地用于的的对外模态贸易。方法:我们随机治疗39通风与少尿型急性肾功能衰竭的危重病人,要么连续静脉 - 静脉血液滤过(CVVH治疗,N = 19;年龄,50.1 + / - 3.2岁;急性生理和慢性健康评估II的APACHEⅡ评分,32.3 + / - 1.2; 79%败血症)和一个作者:至少有30 mL / kg的/24小时Ĥ,或与为12小时内的扩展的的透析组(n = 20的的替代流体率;年龄,50.8±/ - 3.6岁;的APACHE II得分,33.6 + / - 1.0; 85%的败血症)。后者采用易于处理,单通,一批透析系统。留置动脉导管侵入血流动力学参数监测。结果:平均平均动脉血压,心率,心脏输出,全身血管阻力和儿茶酚胺剂量没有显着两种疗法的不同。尿素减少率是类似的扩展透析滤过治疗(53%+ / - 2%与52%+ / - 3%,P =不显着)相比,尽管置换液的平均增长率,后者为3.2 + / - 0.1 L / H。这证实了类似的尿素中收集到的总共花了血液滤过和透析液消除发现。纠正酸中毒,实现更快,比延长透析滤过和肝素的使用量,延长透析(P <0.05)明显降低。结论:延长透析结合,甚至在ICU重症患者与心血管疾病的耐受性良好的清热解毒,。的技术上简单的的透析系统中使用的提供作者:治疗时间的的的灵活性。
Epistemonikos ID: 4a29982f30c926542106a0c2d97ae8ba698fb9ad
First added on: Sep 23, 2011
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use