A review of the literature regarding stress among nursing students during their clinical education.

Machine translation Machine translation
作者 Alzayyat A, Al-Gamal E -More
类别 Systematic review
期刊International nursing review
Year 2014
連結 Pubmed, DOI
背景：周围切除边缘（CRM）参与切除性食管癌（EC）的预后影响是有争议的。美国病理学家学院（CAP）和皇家病理学院（RCP）提供了CRM不同定义。该系统评价的目的是评估由于EC引起的食管切除术后患者存活的临床意义。方法：搜索PubMed，Science Direct和Google学者，研究分析CRM在EC中的临床影响。摘要：共有28项研究分析了积极的CRM在EC中的预后效应。据报道，涉及范围广泛（8.6-83.1％）。两种可用的荟萃分析发现无论RCP（OR 2.52 [95％CI 1.96-3.25; p <0.001]）或CAP（OR 4.02 [95％CI 2.25-7.20; p <0.001]）标准。新辅助治疗对CRM的影响尚不清楚。关键信息：CRM参与是EC患者预后的有用参数。 CAP标准的应用应该是优选的，因为可以更充分地鉴定预后不良的患者。新辅助治疗和整体经胸腔食管切除术对于实现负面CRM有显着的效果。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: 3cc3f556c69124d6c8506395b13d792169da8922
First added on: Jun 10, 2014
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use