OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define the calf proportion index (CPI) and investigate its association with malnutrition and survival in overweight and obese patients with cancer. METHODS: This multicenter observational cohort study included 3499 patients diagnosed with cancer, including 3145 overweight and 354 obese individuals. The CPI was defined as the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the calf circumference (CC) to the body surface area (BSA). A CPI calculator that automatically calculated the CPI and survival probability based on the patient's sex, height, weight, and CC was developed. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 44.1 months, 935 deaths were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the CPI was better than CC and BSA as a predictor of survival, with AUCs for the 3-year mortality rate were 0.574, 0.553 and 0.529, respectively. In overweight and obese patients with cancer, the optimal CPI cut-off value was 0.65 % for men and 0.57 % for women. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that patients with a low CPI had lower survival. After adjusting confounding factors, a low CPI was an independent risk factor for overweight (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.51, P < 0.001) and obesity (HR: 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.20-3.09, P = 0.007) in patients with cancer. The CPI exhibited significant prognostic value in patients with lung and digestive system cancers. The risk of malnutrition was significantly higher in patients with a low CPI (HR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.50, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The CPI is a useful prognostic indicator in overweight and obese patients with cancer, especially in obese patients.

Type 1 cardiorenal syndrome is associated with significant excess morbidity and mortality in patients with severe acute decompensated heart failure. Previous trials of vasoactive drugs and ultrafiltration have not shown superiority over placebo or intravenous diuretics. Pilot data suggest short-term mechanical support devices may support diuresis in the cardiorenal syndrome. We evaluated the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and a novel intra-aortic entrainment pump (IAEP) in a mock circulation loop (MCL) biventricular systolic heart failure model, to assess impact on renal flow and cardiac hemodynamics. Both devices produced similar and only modest increase in renal flow (IABP 3.3% vs. IAEP 4.3%) and cardiac output, with associated reduction in afterload elastance in the MCL. There were minor changes in coronary flow, increase with IABP and minor decrease with IAEP. Differences in device preload and afterload did not impact percentage change in renal flow with IABP therapy, however, there was a trend toward higher percentage flow change with IAEP in response to high baseline renal flow. The IAEP performed best in a smaller aorta and with more superior positioning within the descending aorta. Demonstrated changes in MCL flow during IAEP were of lower magnitude than previous animal studies, possibly due to lack of autoregulation and hormonal responses.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events, particularly strokes, remain a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Embolic protection devices have failed to show significant clinical benefit in large randomized clinical trials. Aortic wall thrombus (AWT) is often observed on multidetector computed tomography during TAVR work-up, but its prognostic significance is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between the presence of AWT and the incidence of thromboembolic outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent TF TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between January 2011 and April 2022. A dedicated scale (range: 0-10) was qualitatively used to assess AWT. The primary outcome was a composite of procedural thromboembolic events defined as ischemic stroke, blue toe syndrome, bowel ischemia, or other solid organ infarction. The secondary endpoints were ischemic strokes and procedural death. RESULTS: Of the 641 patients included, severe AWT (score ≥8) was identified in 73 (11.4%). The presence of severe AWT was strongly associated with an increase in the primary outcome (OR: 8.48; 95% CI: 3.36-21.40; P < 0.001). This relationship persisted following multivariable analysis, which adjusted for comorbidities and procedural characteristics. The presence of severe AWT was also found to be associated with an increased incidence of stroke and procedural death (OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 2.00-15.30; P = 0.002 and OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 1.80-11.30; P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of severe AWT on preprocedural multidetector computed tomography is strongly associated with thromboembolic complications including stroke and mortality after TF TAVR.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect and safety of the combined use of ivabradine and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Eighty patients with AMI were randomly divided into the ivabradine group and the control group. The ivabradine group was treated with ivabradine combined with metoprolol after PCI, while the control group was treated with metoprolol only. Both groups were treated continuously for 1 year. Echocardiography-derived parameters, heart rate, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and myocardial markers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The safety outcomes were blood pressure, liver and kidney function. RESULTS: The LVEF was significantly higher in the ivabradine group than in the control group at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after PCI. The heart rate of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 week and 1month after PCI. The VO2max, metabolic equivalents, anaerobic threshold heart rate, peak heart rate, and heart rate recovery at 8 min of the ivabradine group were significantly higher than those of the control group at 1 year after PCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the one-year total incidence of MACE in the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The B-type natriuretic peptide of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 2 and Day 3 after PCI. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I level of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 5 after PCI. CONCLUSION: Early use of ivabradine in patients with AMI after PCI can achieve effective heart rate control, reduce myocardial injury, improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance, and may reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. (Clinical research registration number: ChiCTR2000032731).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Maternal obesity is associated with a decreased intention and initiation of breastfeeding as well as a shortened duration of breastfeeding. This analysis was undertaken to identify breastfeeding behaviours, and relationships with maternal anthropometry and the serum metabolome at 6-months postpartum in an ethnically diverse cohort of women with obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A cohort analysis of 715 women from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT); a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of an antenatal lifestyle intervention in women with obesity. Maternal data were collected in early pregnancy and included body mass index (BMI), socio-demographic characteristics and anthropometry. At 6-months postpartum, breastfeeding behaviours, anthropometry and 158 maternal metabolic measures from blood samples were recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves of breastfeeding duration were constructed and were stratified by obesity class (I: BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m2, II: 35.0-39.9 kg/m2, III: ≥40.0 kg/m2). Relationships between breastfeeding behaviours, socio-demographic characteristics, the metabolome, and anthropometry were determined using regression analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent (591/715) of the cohort-initiated breastfeeding and at the 6-month follow-up 40% (283/715) were breastfeeding exclusively or partially. Duration of exclusive breastfeeding decreased with increasing BMI: Compared to BMI class I (mean 90.4 ± 64 days) the difference in mean for classes II and III were -15.8 days (95% confidence interval: -28.5, -3.1, p < 0.05) and -16.7 (95% CI: -32.0 to -1.35, p < 0.05), respectively. Compared to no breastfeeding, any breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum was associated with improvements in metabolites towards a healthier profile, reduced weight retention by -1.81 kg (95% CI -0.75, -2.88, p < 0.05 ) and reduced anthropometric measures, including mid-upper arm and hip circumferences. The breastfeeding related changes in anthropometry were not evident in women of Black ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Greater emphasis on enabling breastfeeding for women with obesity could improve duration, women's weight management and metabolic health. The lack of breastfeeding related anthropometric effects in Black women requires further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ISRCTN reference 89971375.

BACKGROUND: Despite the effectiveness of cognitive remediation, it is not widely implemented because we do not know whether teams will accept it, how much therapist time is needed, whether there are factors which predict lower benefits, whether it is cost-effective and what is required for large-scale roll-out. OBJECTIVE: To understand the factors that will enhance implementation and benefits of cognitive remediation in Early Intervention Services. DESIGN: Four work packages: (1) focus groups and interviews exploring the development of satisfaction and preference measures for staff and service users; participant team interviews to collect data, before and after introducing cognitive remediation, to understand team dynamics; (2) an observational study of a newly developed therapist e-training programme; (3) a multiarm multistage four-arm randomised controlled trial comparing different amounts of therapist input with Treatment as Usual; and (4) an analysis of trial data to understand potential mediating and moderating factors that affect treatment benefits. SETTING: Early Intervention Services in the United Kingdom National Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Staff and service users in touch with Early Intervention Services. INTERVENTIONS: For the e-training, we piloted and then provided an e-learning system for training cognitive remediation therapists. For the randomised trial, we provided a cognitive remediation software programme (CIRCuiTS™,King’s College London, London) that was delivered in three conditions, all offering up to 42 sessions of cognitive remediation. The conditions were: Intensive (one to one with a therapist), Group treatment with a therapist, Independent with drop-in sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Work package 1: We developed two satisfaction measures and tested a team dynamic model. Work package 2: Feasibility and acceptability questionnaire, time to complete e-training modules. Work package 3: The personal recovery measure – Goal Attainment Scale. RESULTS: Work package 1: The service user satisfaction with cognitive remediation was reliable and valid. Although it did not show statistically significant differences between the arms of the trial, the most preferred methods (Group and Intensive) had higher associated satisfaction. Team leadership and especially a flattened hierarchy, resources and time were identified as vital for implementation. Our team dynamic model supported the importance of leadership in influencing organisational climate, which then affected staff attitudes. However, this was only significant before staff had any experience of their patients receiving cognitive remediation. Although the sample was much smaller after therapy, this may indicate that experience of the beneficial therapy changes team dynamics. Work package 2: The e-training modules were completed by 43% of the recruited participants. They judged the training to be feasible and acceptable, but it did take longer to complete than expected. COVID-19 with the increased workload may have had some effects, but our data exploration shows that it was individuals who had most recently qualified who had the best outcomes. This may be because of a lighter workload or that they were more used to online training. Adaptations suggested are now being implemented. Work package 3: Following the interim analysis we closed two arms – Independent therapy and Treatment as Usual. Four hundred and forty-eight patients consented and 377 were eligible and completed baseline assessment. They were randomised: Group 134, Independent 65, Intensive 112 and Treatment as Usual 66. At post therapy, there were no differences between Group and Intensive or between Independent and Treatment as Usual, but the combined Group and Intensive versus Treatment as Usual was significant (mean difference: 5.734; standard error = 1.958; p = 0.003; lower confidence interval = 1.898 to upper confidence interval = 9.571). Our economic analysis showed that Group and Intensive cognitive remediation were not different with respect to quality-adjusted life-years (difference £150, 95% confidence interval –£1132 to £1905). Both conferred significant benefit compared with standard care (Group and Treatment as Usual: difference £257, 95% confidence interval –£1694 to £2615; Intensive vs. Treatment as Usual: difference £260, 95% CI –£1654 to £2239). Their cost–benefit for quality-adjusted life-year improvement was well below the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold for adopting the intervention to National Health Service services. Work package 4: Cognition had a small mediation effect, and negative symptoms moderated the transfer of cognitive benefits to goal attainment. LIMITATIONS: The trial suffered from recruitment difficulties which were overcome when we switched from block to individual randomisation. The final target was large enough to test our main outcomes and moderating and mediating variables. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive remediation should be provided in the National Health Service, involving a trained therapist on a Group or Intensive format with team and training support. FUTURE WORK: We have a large database and will continue to investigate factors that affect cognitive remediation benefits. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860. FUNDING: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (NIHR award ref: RP-PG-0612-20002) and is published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 12, No. 4. See the NIHR funding and Awards website for further award information.

COVID-19 continues to pose significant global health challenges, leading to continuous developments in detection, vaccination, and treatment strategies that require an accurate and rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunoglobulin G (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) antibodies. Since its emergence in 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has undergone multiple mutations, leading to the development of new variants that necessitate updated vaccines and diagnostic methodologies. This study presents an innovative fluorescence nanosensor utilizing modified sustainable silica for the ultra-sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. The sensor employs fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles (FSNP) synthesized via the sol-gel method and functionalized with rhodamine B as a fluorescence dye. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analysis confirmed the successful immobilization of anti-IgG on the FSNP surface, as evidenced by characteristic amide I and II peaks at 1641 cm-1 and 1530 cm-1, respectively. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was achieved through enhanced fluorescence intensity of FSNP-anti-IgG at 582 nm. Optimal detection conditions were established with a 15-minute incubation period, demonstrating a linear detection range from 10-2 to 10-8 µg/mL and a limit of detection (LOD) of 5.3 fg/mL. This research highlights the potential of modified sustainable silica-based fluorescence nanosensors for advancing sensitive and rapid COVID-19 diagnostics.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence, mainly from high-income countries, that digital health interventions improve type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care. Large-scale implementation studies are lacking. METHODS: A multifaceted digital health intervention comprising: (1) a self-management application ('app') for patients and lay 'family health promotors' (FHPs); and (2) clinical decision support for primary care doctors was evaluated in an open-label, parallel, cluster randomized controlled trial in 80 communities (serviced by a primary care facility for >1000 residents) in Hebei Province, China. People >40 years with T2DM and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7% were recruited (∼25/community). After baseline assessment, community clusters were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups (1:1) via a web-based system, stratified by locality (rural/urban). Control arm clusters received usual care without access to the digital health application or family health promoters. The primary outcome was at the participant level defined as the proportion with ≥2 "ABC" risk factor targets achieved (HbA1c < 7.0%, blood pressure < 140/80 mmHg and LDL-cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L) at 24 months. FINDINGS: A total of 2072 people were recruited from the 80 community clusters (40 urban and 40 rural), with 1872 (90.3%) assessed at 24 months. In the intervention arm, patients used FHPs for support more in rural than urban communities (252 (48.6%) rural vs 92 (21.5%) urban, p < 0.0001). The mean monthly proportion of active app users was 46.4% (SD 7.8%) with no significant difference between urban and rural usage rates. The intervention was associated with improved ABC control rates (339 [35.9%] intervention vs 276 [29.9%] usual care; RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.40; p = 0.025), with significant heterogeneity by geography (rural 220 [42.6%] vs 158 [31.0%]; urban 119 [27.9%] vs 118 [28.6%]; p = 0.022 for interaction). Risk factor reductions were mainly driven by improved glycaemic control (mean HbA1C difference -0.33%, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.17; p = 0.00025 and mean fasting plasma glucose difference -0.58 mmol, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.27; p = 0.00013). There were no changes in blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol levels. INTERPRETATION: A multifaceted digital health intervention improved T2DM risk factor control rates, particularly in rural communities where there may be stronger relationships between patients and doctors and greater family member support. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research CouncilGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases (ID 1094712).

AIMS: Emergency department (ED) providers play an important role in the management of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We present findings from a pilot study of an electronic decision support that includes personalized risk estimates using the STRIDE-HF risk tool and tailored recommendations for initiating guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) among appropriate patients. METHODS: Among ED patients treated for AHF who were discharged from the ED or the ED-based observation unit in two EDs from 1 January 2023 to 31 July 2023, we assess prescriptions to the four classes of GDMT at two intervals: (1) ED arrival and (2) ED discharge. Specifically, we report active prescriptions for beta-blockers (BBs), renin-angiotensin receptor system inhibitors (RASis), sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) among patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF). Second, we describe rates of 30-day serious adverse events (SAE) (death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, balloon-pump insertion, intubation, new dialysis, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization) among patients predicted to be very low risk by STRIDE-HF and discharged home. RESULTS: Among 234 discharged patients, 55% were female and 76% were non-White. We found 51 (21.8%), 21 (9.0%) and 126 (53.8%) had HFrEF, HFmEF and HFpEF, respectively, while 36 (15.4%) were missing EF, and 51 (22%) were very low risk, 82 (35%) were low risk, 60 (26%) were medium risk and 41 (18%) were high risk. Among HFrEF patients, 68.6%, 66.7%, 25.5% and 19.6% were on a RASi, BB, SGLT2i and MRA, respectively, at ED arrival, while 42.9%, 66.7%, 14.3% and 4.8% of HFmrEF patients were on a RASi, BB, SGLT2i and MRA, respectively. Among patients with HFpEF, only 6 (4.8%) were on an SGLT2i at ED arrival. The most prescribed new medication at ED discharge was an SGLT2i, with a nearly 10% increase in the proportion of patients with an active prescription for SGLT2i at ED discharge among HFrEF and HFmEF patients. We observed no 30-day SAE among the 51 patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing treatment with GDMT at ED arrival was sub-optimal. Initiation among appropriate patients at discharge may be feasible and safe.

PURPOSE: Repeated cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) increase the health risk of radiation-induced malignancies. Patient-enrolled studies to optimize scan protocols are inadequate. We proposed a virtual clinical trial-based approach to evaluate projection-reduced low-dose CBCT for IGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 71 patients were virtually enrolled with 26 head, 23 thorax and 22 pelvis scans. Projection numbers of full-dose CBCT scans were reduced to 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 of the original to simulate low-dose scans. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values in fat and muscle were measured in the full-dose and low-dose images. CBCT images were registered to planning CT to derive 6-degree-of-freedom couch shifts. Registration errors were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test. RESULTS: As projection numbers were reduced, CNR values descended and the magnitude of registration errors increased. The mean CNR values of full-dose and half-dose CBCT were >3.0. For full-dose and low-dose CBCT (i.e. 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 full-dose), the mean registration errors were< ± 0.4 mm in translational directions (LAT, LNG, VRT) and ±0.2 degree in rotational directions (Pitch, Roll, Yaw); the mean magnitude of registration errors were< 1 mm in translation and< 0.5 degree in rotation. The couch shift differences between full-dose and low-dose CBCT were not statistically significant (p>0.05) in all the directions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that while the impact of dose-reduction on CBCT couch shifts is not significant, the impact on CNR values is significant. Further validation on optimizing CBCT imaging dose is required.