Clinical progress after randomized on/off pacemaker treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Pacing in Cardiomyopathy (PIC) Study Group.

Pas encore traduit Pas encore traduit
Catégorie Primary study
JournalEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Year 1999

This article is not included in any systematic review

Loading references information

BACKGROUND:

The therapeutic options for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) classically include medical treatment with beta-blockers and calcium antagonists or myectomy-myotomy as a surgical possibility for refractory cases. The observation that pacemaker activation of the heart in HOCM reduces the subaortic gradient is well known but less well investigated.

METHODS:

Eighty-three patients (33 female and 50 male) mean age 53 (18-82) years, with symptoms refractory to drug treatment and a resting gradient above 30 mmHg, who responded favourably to temporary pacing, were included in this prospective study and had a pacemaker (DDD) implanted. After an initial double-blind crossover phase of 6 months, patients were reinvestigated at 12 months and followed for a mean of 36 months.

RESULTS:

As observed during a screening investigation, the obstruction was significantly reduced from 72 +/- 35 mmHg to 29 +/- 24 mmHg (P < 0.01) when the pacemaker was on, while no major effect was seen during the sham phase. The effect was persistent at 1 year with a remaining resting gradient of 28 +/- 24 mmHg. In parallel, we documented an improvement in functional capacity, according to the NYHA classification and by quality of life analysis, and a significant improvement in dyspnoea and angina. Exercise on treadmill improved only in patients with reduced initial tolerance (< 8 min). During the mean follow-up of 36 months, 65 patients remained on pacing alone, with eight patients having additional AV-node ablation and five patients finally having surgery.

CONCLUSION:

This controlled multicentre study shows that pacemaker treatment is an option for HOCM patients; it is inoffensive and does not exclude alternative methods, but satisfies 79% of patients beyond 3 years.
Epistemonikos ID: d8d5e7a3a38286cc8a1a839bdf85696930c22bee
First added on: May 13, 2022