INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is an orally available multi-kinase inhibitor that inhibits tumor proliferation by targeting multiple kinases including the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3 and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor PDGFR, and it targets tumor progression by inhibiting FLT3, C-Kit and BRAF. Since BRAF mutations are frequent in melanoma, sorafenib was investigated in various Phase I, II and III clinical trials. The drug is well tolerated with mild to moderate adverse effects, which are mostly limited to cutaneous toxicity, diarrhea and fatigue. AREAS COVERED: Systematic literature review of the randomized trials using PubMed was performed. Original articles were reviewed and citations from those were also considered. Additionally, clinical trial databases were examined to identify and summarize ongoing trials of sorafenib in melanoma patients. EXPERT OPINION: Sorafenib as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy is of limited use. Combining it with dacarbazine doubled the response rate and the progression-free survival in metastatic melanoma patients. Unfortunately, these results have never been evaluated in large randomized Phase III clinical trials. According to the trials conducted so far a subpopulation of patients experience substantial benefit, therefore it is essential to identify biomarkers to select the subgroups of patients that are more likely to respond to sorafenib. Furthermore, other less frequent subtypes such as mucosal or ocular melanoma still constitute promising targets; academic institutions are currently launching investigator-initiated trials in these indications.

El melanoma maligno es un tumor que presenta numerosos patrones histológicos que pueden semejar carcinoma o diferentes tipos de sarcoma de alto o bajo grado de malignidad. Una de estas variantes corresponde al melanoma osteogénico, donde se encuentra metaplasia osteocartilaginosa. Se han descrito con diferenciación fibroblástica (melanoma desmoplásico), con diferenciación a células de Schwann (melanoma neurotrópico) y éstos a su vez con diferenciación lipoblástica, rabdomioblástica, con células ganglionares, y con estructuras seudomeissnerianas, así como con degeneración mixoide y de células redondas. En la literatura médica, hasta la fecha han sido informados 17 casos de melanomas osteogénicos, 14 en la piel y tres en mucosas.

INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK there are 8100 new cases of malignant melanoma, and 1800 deaths, largely as a result of metastatic disease. The median survival of people with metastatic melanoma is 6 to 9 months after diagnosis, with 10% of people alive at 5 years. Chemotherapy is given with palliative rather than curative intent for metastatic disease. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma? What are the effects of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 24 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: adding interferon alfa (with or without interleukin-2) to chemotherapy; dacarbazine; single-agent or combination chemotherapy; supportive palliative care alone or with chemotherapy; and temozolomide.

The objective of this analysis is to ascertain the natural history of elderly patients greater than 65 years of age with thick melanoma (T4) who were treated with surgery only. Although there are multiple data on elderly patients, there is not a systematic review of survival in elderly patients over 65 years, and with our analysis we tried to enlighten this field in view especially of the growing population of the elderly in the United States. We retrospectively evaluated 112 patients with thick (> or = 4 mm) melanoma aged 65 or greater. Mean age was 73 years. Mean follow-up was 36 months. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 69 and 52 months, respectively. Univariate analysis predicted worse OS and DFS when patients have positive lymph nodes, high mitotic rate, and increasing thickness. By multivariate analysis, lymph node status was most predictive of OS and DFS. Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in elderly patients with thick melanoma. Our analysis has shown that elderly patients that received no adjuvant treatment did significantly worse than the historical controls. Patients with nodal metastases are candidates for adjuvant therapy. Those without nodal disease constitute a favorable patient group and thus have much better prognosis and may not need adjuvant therapy. However, they must be closely monitored or enrolled in randomized trials. Thus, treatment for melanoma patients older than 65 should be as aggressive as in younger patients, and these patients should not be denied adjuvant treatment based on their age only.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma of the upper aerodigestive tract (MM-UADT) occurs in a complex anatomic region. It represents a small number of tumors of the head and neck and a small number of melanoma cases. METHODS: Search strategies initially identified 600, 11 of which were included in this study. RESULTS: All studies involved surgery and radiotherapy. None were randomized, and all were assessed as having a high risk of selection and performance bias. No studies reported quality of life, treatment-related mortality, or morbidity. The results indicate that the addition of radiotherapy to surgery reduces the rate of locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.87). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.37). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy remains the optimal treatment strategy for locoregional control. More robust studies and the use of molecular targeted therapies need to be undertaken to improve overall survival. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2016.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment for advanced melanoma is lacking. While no drug therapy currently exists for prevention of melanoma, in vitro, case-control, and animal model evidence suggest that lipid-lowering medications, commonly taken for high cholesterol, might prevent melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of statin or fibrate lipid-lowering medications on melanoma outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (February 2003), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (to March 2003), EMBASE (to September 2003), CANCERLIT (to October 2002), Web of Science (to May 2003), and reference lists of articles. We approached study investigators and pharmaceutical companies for additional information (published or unpublished studies). SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials involving random allocation of study participants, where experimental groups used statins or fibrates and participants were enrolled for at least four years of therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors screened 109 abstracts of articles with titles of possible relevance. We then thoroughly examined the full text of 72 potentially relevant articles. We requested unpublished melanoma outcomes data from the corresponding author of each qualifying trial. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 16 qualifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (7 statin, 9 fibrate). Thirteen of these trials (involving 62,197 participants) provided data on incident melanomas (6 statin, 7 fibrate). A total of 66 melanomas were reported in groups receiving the experimental drug and 86 in groups receiving placebo or other control therapies. For statin trials this translated to an odds ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.44) and for fibrate trials an odds ratio of 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.82). Subgroup analyses failed to show statistically significant differences in melanoma outcomes by gender, melanoma occurrence after two years of participation in trial, stage or histology, or trial funding. Subgroup analysis by type of fibrate or statin also failed to show statistically significant differences, except for the statin subgroup analysis which showed reduced melanoma incidence for lovastatin, based on one trial only (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.99). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The melanoma outcomes data collected in this review of RCTs of statins and fibrates does not exclude the possibility that these drugs prevent melanoma. There was a 10% and 42% reduction for participants on statins and fibrates, respectively, however these results were not statistically significant. Until further evidence is established, limiting exposure to ultraviolet radiation remains the most effective way to reduce the risk of melanoma.

High risk surgically resected melanoma is associated with a less than 50% 5-year survival. Adjuvant therapy is an appropriate treatment modality in this setting, and is more likely to be effective as the tumour burden here is small. Clinical observations of spontaneous tumour regressions and a highly variable rate of disease progression suggest a role of the immune system in the natural history of melanoma. Biological agents have therefore been the subjects of numerous adjuvant studies. Early, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), levamisole, Corynebacterium parvum, chemotherapy, isolated limb perfusion (ILP), radiotherapy, transfer factor (TF), megestrol acetate and vitamin A yielded largely negative results. Current trials focus on vaccines and the interferons. To date the latter is the only therapy to have shown a significant benefit in the prospective randomised controlled phase III setting. This report represents a systematic review of studies in adjuvant therapy in melanoma. Data from ongoing studies is awaited before a role for adjuvant agents in high risk melanoma is confirmed.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical development of dabrafenib and to highlight the clinically relevant distinct characteristics of dabrafenib in contrast to vemurafenib. DATA SOURCE: An English-language literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-June 2013), using the keywords GSK2118436, dabrafenib, vemurafenib, selective BRAF inhibitor, and advanced melanoma, was conducted. Data were also obtained from package inserts, meeting abstracts, and clinical registries. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant published articles on dabrafenib and vemurafenib were reviewed. Clinical trial registries and meeting abstracts were used for information about ongoing studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: BRAF(V600E) mutation confers constitutive BRAK kinase activation in melanoma cells, promoting tumor growth. This discovery led to the development of BRAF kinase inhibitors like vemurafenib and dabrafenib. Dabrafenib has been approved to treat patients with BRAF(V600E)-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma based on its clinical benefit demonstrated in a randomized phase III study. It has also been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BRAF mutant advanced melanoma involving the brain. Dabrafenib is well tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being hyperkeratosis, headache, pyrexia, and arthralgia. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that one BRAF inhibitor is superior to the other. With similar efficacy, therapy selection will likely be influenced by differential tolerability and cost. CONCLUSIONS: Dabrafenib joins vemurafenib to confirm the superior clinical outcome of the BRAF inhibitors when compared with dacarbazine in patients with BRAF(V600E)-positive advanced melanoma. Active research is ongoing to expand its utility into the adjuvant setting and to circumvent rapid emergence of drug resistance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the different subtypes of mucosal melanoma and describe specific variables that predict outcomes. METHODS: Prospective review of two tertiary care center databases identified 76 mucosal melanoma patients; 73 with complete records were included. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Cox regression determined variables impacting recurrence and survival. RESULTS: In the 73 patients, the mean age was 64 years, and 74% were female. Sixty-seven percent presented with lymph node involvement, and 73% had ulcerated tumors. Major sites affected were nasal/palate/oral (36%), vulvar/vaginal/cervical (48%), and anorectal (15%). Mean overall and disease-free survival were 56.9 and 27.2 months. Variables associated with decreased survival included: lymphovascular invasion (HR17.70, P = 0.0093), Caucasian race (HR3.02, P = 0.0362), nasal/palate/oral sub-group (HR1.85, P = 0.026), Breslow thickness (HR1.23, P = 0.00004), T stage (HR1.34, P = 0.0075), M stage (HR3.03, P = 0.0039), and chemotherapy (HR3.13, P = 0.0002). The worst prognosis was seen in the nasal/palate/oral sub-group, with a median overall survival of 9.7 months and recurrence-free time of 4.5 months. This subtype also demonstrated high lymph node positivity, ulceration, and larger tumor size. CONCLUSION: The nasal, palate, oral subtype has the worst prognosis compared to other mucosal melanoma locations. Studies are ongoing to evaluate pathologic and genomic variables that may predict outcomes.