Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials

Authors
Category Primary study
JournalJapan Primary Registry Network
Year 2012
INTERVENTION: Intervention type:DRUG. Intervention1:EMD alone vs EMD/FDBA vs EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruption, Dose form:NOT APPLICABLE, Route of administration:NOT APPLICABLE ., Dose form:OTHER, Route of administration:NOT APPLICABLE Control intervention1:EMD alone without graft material (negative control) with or without forced eruption, Dose form:OTHER. CONDITION: Chronoc periodontitis PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1‐year and 3 years follow‐up.. Timepoint:1 year and 3 years follow‐up. SECONDARY OUTCOME: OPAL gain from baseline to 6 month . Timepoint: 6 months reentry surgery. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 6mm>CAL and radiographic bone loss
Epistemonikos ID: fe554e834cd6fa1180ff9fc657b74820922fa12f
First added on: Aug 22, 2024