comparing two warm up methods to see which improves balance better in amateur male cricketers and how long the effect lasts

Authors
Category Primary study
Registry of TrialsClinical Trials Registry - India
Year 2026
INTERVENTION: Intervention1: Ballistic Si XUpper Limb Plyometric Warm‐up: five sessions per week over three week period followed by two week washout period Control Intervention1: Conventional warm up: five sessions per week over three week period followed by two week washout period Control Intervention2: Conventional warm up: five sessions per week over three week period followed by two week washout period CONDITION: PRIMARY OUTCOME: Lower quarter Y balance test ; Upper quarter Y balance test ; Single leg hop testTimepoint: Pre,Post and retention effect Test of Lower quarter Y balance test ; Pre,Post and retention effect Test of Upper quarter Y balance test ; Pre,Post and retention test of Single leg hop test SECONDARY OUTCOME: NILTimepoint: NIL INCLUSION CRITERIA: Male amateur cricketers aged between 16 to 25 years Engaged in structured cricket training for atleast si Xmonths Willingness to participate
Epistemonikos ID: fc2f6aab86bb52fb312e74c5c6ed8369adf51f9c
First added on: Oct 08, 2026