Use of two chemical aids in the treatment of Chronic Periodontitis

INTERVENTION: Chlorhexidine Drug Tea Tree Oil The therapeutic effect of tea tree gel at 2.5% was evaluated in the treatment of chronic periodontal disease in systemically healthy patients through its compared to the therapeutic effect of 1% chlorhexidine gel. It was also evaluated the incidence of adverse effects arising from the use of chemical aids (1% chlorhexidine and 2.5% tea tree) in the form of gel for irrigating bags periodontal treatments in a single dose. Patients from the school of medicine clinic were invited to participate in the research. dentistry at the Centro Universitário Cesmac. After anamnesis and extra‐oral and intra‐oral exams, still during the consultation initial study, patients who met the research criteria were informed regarding it, as well as its importance, and then they were invited to participate as volunteers. After this stage, the IC was read and the volunteer was informed of your participation and your subscription has been collected. Systemically healthy patients, over 18 years of age and under 60 years of age, able to read and sign the ICF and diagnosed with chronic periodontal disease. The study excluded patients with any pathology that negatively influences tissue healing (e.g. diabetes mellitus), pregnant and lactating women, allergic to adjuvants that were used in research and smokers. It is estimated that an average of 200 adult patients per semester receive dental treatment at the CESMAC university center dental clinic. In this universe, there is an estimated prevalence (according to the literature) of 60% of patients with chronic periodontal disease. Therefore, the sample size for the pilot was 24 patients for a statistical test to be applied (student's t) with a significance level of 5% and thus dete CONDITION: Chronic apical periodontitis Chronic apical periodontitis ; Chronic apical periodontitis PRIMARY OUTCOME: Improvement in periodontal parameters, gingival bleeding, biofilm index, position of the gingival margin, depth of vertical probing and level of clinical insertion. The procedures were performed under infiltrative anesthesia with; 2% lidocaine and epinephrine 1: 100,000; corono‐root scraping and smoothing; (RACR) with McCall universal curettes 13‐14 and 17‐18 for supra‐gingival regions; and Gracey curettes 5‐6, 7‐8, 11‐12, 13‐14 for subgingival regions and sickles 00 and; McCall 11‐12 for interproximal regions; coronary polishing with a; rubber and Robinson's brush associated with diamond polishing paste; irrigation of bags with:; Group A (test group): received basic periodontal therapy associated with; irrigation of periodontal pockets with 2.5% tea tree gel.; Group B (positive control group): received basic periodontal therapy; associated with the irrigation of periodontal pockets with 1% chlorhexidine gel. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Secondary outcomes are not expected INCLUSION CRITERIA: The sample consisted of systemically healthy patients; age range 18 to 60 years old; diagnosed with chronic periodontal disease.