Clinical evaluation of different detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibody in the COVID-19 diagnosis

Machine translation Machine translation
Authors
Category Primary study
Journal检验医学 (Laboratory Medicine)
Year 2020
Objective To explore the application of different detection methods for IgM and IgG antibodies of new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods Twenty-five patients with COVID-19 were selected, and 20 patients who were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection during the same period were used as the control group. Serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG were detected by magnetic particle chemiluminescence method and colloidal gold method respectively. antibody. Simultaneous detection of serum procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with COVID-19. Results The sensitivity of the chemiluminescence method to detect serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies was 48% and 56%, and the specificity was 100%. The colloidal gold method was used to detect the sensitivity of serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies. They were 88% and 76%, respectively, and the clinical specificity was 100%. The two methods used to detect the serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were 68.9% and 73.3% respectively. Of the 25 COVID-19 patients, 36% had elevated serum PCT, 72% had elevated serum CRP, and 84% had elevated serum ferritin. Conclusion The detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies are quite different, and should be considered comprehensively when used in the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 patients.
Epistemonikos ID: e3c1746d7366dfe96e1023098fcc82ec90554657
First added on: Jun 25, 2020
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: 中文

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use