Authors
»
Fierheller CT, Deshmukh P, Kalra A, Mohamed H, Ambihapathy W, Chakraborty D, Sideris M, Dibden A, Mitchinson L, Ingle B, Sun Y, Norman G, Corbie R, Gabe R, Monahan K, Brady AF, Crook J, Quaife S, Nicum S, Walter F, Davidson E, MacDonald N, Ryan N, Turnbull C, Tookman L, Evans DG, Legood R, Waller J, Brentnall A, Manchanda R, DETECT-2 team -More
Category
»
Primary study
Journal»International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
Year
»
2026
BACKGROUND: Mainstreaming patients with ovarian, endometrial, and colorectal cancer in the context of genetic testing at cancer diagnosis involves pre-test counseling, consent, and return of results by the clinical cancer team. This process uses significant clinician time and resources. Alternative implementation strategies might be more cost-efficient and better utilize limited cancer health professional and genetics workforce resources, but their efficacy is less well understood.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine if direct-to-patient genetic testing for ovarian, endometrial, and colorectal cancer has equivalent uptake of genetic testing compared with mainstreaming.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Patients at ovarian, endometrial, or colorectal cancer diagnosis have equivalent uptake for genetic testing through direct-to-patient compared with mainstreaming.
TRIAL DESIGN: A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating a digitally enabled direct-to-patient (saliva-based, at home) genetic testing approach (intervention arm) compared with mainstreaming genetic testing (control arm). After study consent and randomization, patients in the direct-to-patient arm are offered access to an app-based decision aid, consent to genetic testing via the app, and access to a helpline for additional support and counseling if needed. Control arm participants are offered routine mainstreaming genetic testing in the clinic. We include a qualitative sub-study of 1:1 interviews to understand the attitudes, experiences, and impact on emotional well-being of patients undergoing genetic testing.
MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria include diagnosis of ovarian, endometrial, or colorectal cancer fulfilling the National Health Service clinical genetic testing criteria. Exclusion criteria include prior genetic testing for or a known familial pathogenic variant in ovarian, endometrial, or colorectal cancer susceptibility genes.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Absolute difference in uptake of genetic testing between arms in the intention-to-treat population, with equivalence determined using a 10% margin based on a 2-sided 95% confidence interval.
SAMPLE SIZE: Target n = 626 to 832 patients. We will test equivalence if ≥626 patients are recruited in the intention-to-treat population.
ESTIMATED DATE FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Recruitment by December 2026 and publication of results in 2028.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN:57402067 (July 26, 2023). (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57402067).
Epistemonikos ID: d57960fad86be92884ff333fa838d7e4b653f68c
First added on: Oct 28, 2026