Is the control of disease progression within our grasp? Review of the GRISAR study. (Gruppo Reumatologi Italiani Studio Artrite Reumatoide)

The requested reference [dad7e44da6af212dea959801e6b64b5cc6980c2f] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [4262e9377fe36e531703a7bc975649e1c1359b9b]

Authors
Category Primary study
JournalBritish journal of rheumatology
Year 1996
A prospective, open, multicentre, randomized study with a blinded radiological end‐point was started in 1991. The aim of the study was to assess whether cyclosporin A (CyA) controls ongoing anatomical damage in active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) better than conventional disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as used in everyday clinical practice. A total of 340 consenting patients with early RA (mean duration 1.4 yr) were recruited; 167 were randomized to CyA 3mg/kg per day and 173 to DMARDs. Hand, wrist and foot X‐rays were blindly scored by a central committee of three radiologists using the Larsen‐Dale method. Any side‐effects were carefully recorded. The control of clinical symptoms was similar in both groups. Radiological evaluation of 284 patients (141 on CyA; 143 on DMARDs) after 12 months showed a significant decrease in the mean progression in the eroded joint count (1.3 +/‐ 3.1 vs 2.4 +/‐ 3.0, P < 0.001). There was also better maintenance on treatment with CyA than in the group treated with DMARDs (89.2 vs 77.5%, respectively; P = 0.002). CyA seems to offer greater control of ongoing anatomical joint damage in early RA than conventional DMARDs after 12 months.
Epistemonikos ID: 7d72b1280700f29fa48aa0362b6b2985cc46af2f
First added on: Feb 04, 2019