Safety and Efficacy of Abatacept Over 4 Years of Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate in the AIM Trial

Authors
Category Primary study
Conference64th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) and 17th Winter Workshop; 2009 Feb 18-21; Kananaskis, AB, Canada. The Journal of Rheumatology
Year 2009
OBJECTIVE: To present the safety and efficacy of abatacept over 4 years in the AIM trial. METHODS: AIM was a randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial of 12 months’ duration. Patients received a fixed dose of abatacept (~10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus methotrexate (MTX). Patients completing the DB period were eligible to enroll in the open-label long-term extension (LTE) period (fixed dose of abatacept ~10 mg/kg every 4 weeks plus MTX). Safety was assessed for all patients who received ≥1 dose of abatacept; incidence rates per 100 patient-years (pt-yrs) were calculated. Efficacy analyses included ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses, and are presented for all patients with data available at the visit of interest (as-observed analysis). RESULTS: A total of 433 and 219 patients were randomized and treated with abatacept or placebo, respectively; 378 and 161 of these patients entered the LTE period. In total, 414/539 (76.8%) patients who entered the LTE remained on treatment at the end of the 4 year study period. The types and incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were similar between the DB versus cumulative (combined DB + LTE) periods (303.4 vs 244.2/100 pt-yrs and 17.7 vs 14.7/100 pt-yrs, respectively). Incidence rates of infections and serious infections were 90.5 versus 69.0/100 pt-yrs and 4.2 versus 3.1/100 pt-yrs, in the DB versus cumulative periods, respectively. Malignancies, autoimmune events and tuberculosis (TB) were reported in 28 (4.7%), 45 (7.6%) and 3 (0.7%) patients, respectively, over 4 years. In the cumulative study period, 62 (10.4%) and 40 (6.7%) patients discontinued due to AEs and SAEs, respectively. The proportion of abatacept-treated patients who were ACR responders increased over 4 years; with no overlap of 95% CIs at 6 months and 4 years. CONCLUSION: In the LTE period of the AIM trial, the safety of abatacept remained consistent with the DB period, with no unique or unexpected events observed over 4 years. Retention rates remained high and abatacept provided durable improvements in ACR responses over 4 years of treatment.
Epistemonikos ID: c41f67d7e1f0c84ad7e8893d4fe15f8670b9d8cf
First added on: Mar 23, 2022