Evaluation the Impact of the "Pas" Technique Versus the "Standard" Technique on Radiation Exposure

The purpose of this study is to compare both techniques and analyze the data from the \"Standard\" technique to help design the \"PAS\" technique. In the \"PAS\" technique, investigators predetermine the distances from the needles and place them all together using our initial target needle marker in the objective anatomic landmark. Will randomized patients assigning them either in cohort 1 control \"Standard\" of care technique and cohort 2 \"PAS\" technique. After only utilizing the \"Standard\" of care technique, will obtain the measurements and distances from the needles inserted in patients under fluoroscopic guidance for the different pain procedures. The data will help demonstrate that is possible to predict the needle placement replicating with confidence good outcomes using the \"PAS\" technique to reduce the radiation exposure and time. Our data will justify the use of the \"PAS\" technique to become an alternative to the \"Standard\" of care technique for a faster, efficient, and replicable needle placement for diminished radiation exposure, to avoid complications and consistent good outcomes