Correction: The comparative efficacy and safety of sweet solutions to reduce preterm infants’ pain levels: a systematic review and network meta‑analysis

Following the official publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed some minor, typographical errors in the initials of the independent researchers. The corrections are given below in bold: “Two researchers (O.O. and O.O)” should be “Two researchers (A.M. and R.N.) “a consensus moderated by the first author (O.O.)” should be “a consensus moderated by the first author (D.E.)” “O. O. and O. O. independently extracted data from the reviewed studies” should be “D. E. and R. N independently extracted data from the reviewed studies.” “Two independent researchers (O. O. and O. O.) evaluated the risk of bias (RoB)” should be “Two independent researchers (A.M. and R.N.) evaluated the risk of bias (RoB)” “Two researchers (O.O. and O.O)” should be “Two researchers (A.M. and R.N.) “a consensus moderated by the first author (O.O.)” should be “a consensus moderated by the first author (D.E.)” “O. O. and O. O. independently extracted data from the reviewed studies” should be “D. E. and R. N independently extracted data from the reviewed studies.” “Two independent researchers (O. O. and O. O.) evaluated the risk of bias (RoB)” should be “Two independent researchers (A.M. and R.N.) evaluated the risk of bias (RoB)” Furthermore, minor errors were also spotted in capturing the Standard Mean Difference. Under the heading Secondary Outcomes, “SMD” should be captured as “MD” only. The corrections do not compromise the validity of the conclusions and the overall content of the article. The original article [1] has been corrected.