[Effect of complementary treatment of Chinese drugs on myocardial perfusion patients with acute myocardial infarction after coronary intervention: a systematic review].

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the safety and efficacy of routine Western medicine (WM) plus Chinese drugs for no-flow or slow flow after coronary revascularization. METHODS: CNKI, VIP, CBM, Wanfang Data, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBase, and other relevant databases were electronically searched. Literatures were also manually retrieved from related journals. Randomized control trials of treating no-flow or slow flow patients after coronary revascularization by routine WM treatment plus Chinese drugs were retrieved. The quality of retrieved literature was assessed by methods from Cochrane Handbook. Valid data were extracted and analyzed by meta-analysis using RevMan5. 1.0 Software. Results Totally 5 trials including 526 patients with poor general quality were included. RESULTS: of meta-analyses showed that compared with the routine WM treatment group, additional use of Chinese drugs could improve thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) [RR =0. 16, 95% Cl (0.07, 0.34), P < 0.01]; reduce elevated ST segment significantly [RR = 0.59, 95% CI (0.44, 0.79), P = 0. 00031]; in- crease regional myocardial blood flow (P < 0.01) and myocardial perfusion scores (P = 0.0109, P = 0.0115); and improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) under dobutamine stress state (P = 0.041). Only one trial covered a 6-month follow-up study. There was no statistical difference in the mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, or revascularization between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in adverse event or safety indicators between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the WM treatment, complementary Chinese drugs could reduce occurrence of no-flow or slow flow after coronary revascularization, and further improve clinical efficacy. But larger and higher quality clinical trials are necessary for further evidence.