Comparison of Two Bone Expansion Techniques for Dental Implant Placement in the Front Tooth Region: A Randomized Clinical Study

INTERVENTION: Intervention1: Osseodensification‐assisted implant osteotomy using Densah burs: Patients randomized to the experimental group will undergo implant osteotomy preparation to expand the narrow alveolar ridge using Densah burs in counter‐clockwise (densifying) mode Control Intervention1: Ridge split technique using piezosurgery with simultaneous dental implant placement: Patients will undergo crestal ridge split using a piezoelectric surgical device to expand the narrow alveolar ridge CONDITION: PRIMARY OUTCOME: To compare increase in alveolar ridge widthTimepoint: Baseline and 6 months SECONDARY OUTCOME: clinical parameters like implant success VAS PI GI bleeding on probingTimepoint: Baseline 3 months 6 months Compare marginal bone level chnagesTimepoint: Baseline and 6 months Esthetic parameters including PESTimepoint: immediately after implant placement, 3 months, 6 months INCLUSION CRITERIA: Having at least two missing anterior teeth Ridge width between 3 and 5 mm Ridge height of at least 8 mm