Randomized Controlled Study on the Treatment of Neurorhizotypic Cervical Chiropractic in Multi-Method Evaluation

Machine translation Machine translation
Authors
Category Primary study
Journal华西医学
Year 2016
Objective Objective To observe the efficacy of supine conjugular traction in the treatment of neural root cervical vertebrae disease (CSR). Method of randomizing 71 single segment CSR patients hospitalized from August 2011 to December 2013 into two groups, 36 cases of supine transjugular traction combined with electroception, acupuncture, pulsion, and medium pulse treatment in control group of 35 cases With seat cervical traction with electric needle, acupuncture, push, medium Frequent pulse therapy, observation period 15 d. Measurement of cervical curvature by side of the cervical vertebrae X-ray with visual simulation score (VAS), cervical dysfunction index scale (NDI), TCM medical certificate diagnostic efficacy criteria, cervical clinical evaluation scale (CASCS) score. The cervical arc string distance between the test group and the control group were (4.07±3.63, respectively ), (4.13±3.02) mm, (9.03±4.31), (8.87±3.97) mm after treatment, and the difference in cervical arc distance and string arc distance increase after treatment were not statistically significant (P−0.05); the total effectiveness of the trial group and control group rate of 100.00% and The difference was statistically significant (P≈ 0.05), VAS scores were (8.43±0.75), (8.35±0.78), and VAS scores were (1.40±0.61), (2.55±0.59). Rating both (P≈ 0.01), the trial group was significantly lower than the control group (P0.01); the NDI scores were (54.13±7.44), (55.85±8.72) after treatment (10.78±4.55), (12.66±5.48), and the NDI scores were significantly lower after treatment (P^0.01), The differences between the trial and control groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05); the CACSC scores were (34.88±5.39), (34.77±4.89), and after treatment (74.65±6.73), (69.03±6.21). 0.01), two groups after treatment CASCS Score Added Value Difference is not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Cervical traction combined with electrocution, acupuncture, push and medium frequency pulse is an effective method for treating CSR, supine ductile traction is better.
Epistemonikos ID: a210b31e857622cdeb96f18740434a06cc428a12
First added on: Aug 10, 2020
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: 中文

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use