Study to compare the effect of Conventional gingiva former (cylindrical in Shape) and Tooth Shaped Gingiva former used on Dental Implants

Authors
Category Primary study
Registry of TrialsClinical Trials Registry - India
Year 2011
INTERVENTION: Intervention1: Custom made anatomic healing abutment: Custom made anatomic healing abutment with the shape of cervical portion of the tooth will be prepared in a dental lab using titanium. Control Intervention1: conventional healing abutment: conventional healing abutment is cylindrical in shape. does not reflect the anatomy of tooth being replaced. conventional healing abutments are commercially available. CONDITION: DENTISTRY: Healthy human volunteers with missing central incisor teeth and willing for implant treatment PRIMARY OUTCOME: Gingival Papilla Index ; Sulcus Depth‐‐‐‐‐‐Timepoint: Three months SECONDARY OUTCOME: Emergence Profile ; ‐‐‐‐‐‐Timepoint: Three months INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Patents with age ranging between 18 and 40 years. 2. Good oral hygiene status [ OHI ?S Score ( 0‐1.2) ] 3. Willingness for implant replacement in maxillary central incisor region 4. Absence of Diastema 5. Sufficient bone volume at the implant site, facio‐palatal width greater than 5.5 mm and mesiodistal space greater than 6.5 mm, height greater than 12 mm. 6. ASA Classification P S 1[Normal healthy patient]
Epistemonikos ID: a178576d518902170d7e753739b9081859c3ed20
First added on: Aug 22, 2024