Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Calcium Supplementation in Pregnancy

The requested reference [87702c0c442157f91752a2d2aea18f51de4da4aa] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [9e495dab46c7013708c88b2723ea1098ed48fb74]

Authors
Category Primary study
Registry of TrialsClinicalTrials.gov
Year 2026
This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled pilot trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a targeted low-dose (300 mg/day) versus a standard high-dose (600 mg/day) calcium supplementation during mid-to-late pregnancy. The main research content is divided into the following four core dimensions: 1. Evaluation of Maternal Skeletal and Systemic Calcium Efficacy: The core efficacy evaluation focuses on the preservation of maternal bone mineral density throughout mid-to-late pregnancy. This is assessed by the change in the BMD Z-score (ΔZ-score) from baseline to delivery using quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Concurrently, by comparing pre- and post-intervention maternal serum total calcium concentrations, the study verifies whether the low-dose regimen is sufficient to maintain normal systemic calcium homeostasis and support fetal development. 2. Safety Assessment of Renal Filtration and Metabolic Burden: To investigate the potential metabolic toxicity of high-dose calcium, the study explicitly evaluates the maternal renal calcium excretion burden. By measuring the change in the fasting urinary calcium-to-creatinine ratio (ΔU-Ca/Cr) before and after the intervention, the research aims to determine whether the targeted low-dose regimen effectively prevents iatrogenic absorptive hypercalciuria induced by excessive calcium overload. 3. Evaluation of Clinical Gastrointestinal Tolerability: Given that gastrointestinal adverse events are the primary deterrent to prenatal supplement adherence, this study utilizes the internationally recognized Rome IV criteria to rigorously track and compare the time-to-onset and cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe constipation between the two groups, thereby quantifying the difference in intestinal tolerability between the dosages. 4. Exploration of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and General Safety: As an exploratory clinical endpoint, the study records and compares the incidence rates of preeclampsia and preterm birth between the two intervention arms to ensure the low-dose regimen safely maintains prophylactic benefits against adverse obstetric outcomes. Furthermore, a comprehensive panel of maternal general laboratory parameters (e.g., hepatic and renal function, lipid profiles, and hematology) is monitored throughout to guarantee overall systemic safety.
Epistemonikos ID: 99c580533ae2c6a5aa711f17ef5107659ffc8ec6
First added on: Aug 26, 2026