Acupuncture therapy for radiotherapy-induced adverse effect: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The requested reference [1371907c3dad7213f92f76df6e36688b0daa3060] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [0d117b07f45d0c28677eb2414cbfd1c261eb5d96]

Authors
Category Systematic review
JournalFrontiers in public health
Year 2022
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different acupuncture therapies for radiotherapy-induced adverse effects (RIAEs) and find out the optimal scheme. METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected from inception to June 2020 from 9 bibliographic databases. The risk of bias evaluation of the analyzed literature was carried out using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Network meta-analysis was mainly performed using STATA 14.2 and OpenBUGS 3.2.3 by figuring out the network diagrams, league figures, and SUCRA values. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies with 3,011 participants reported data suitable for network meta-analysis. There was a low to moderate risk of bias in twenty of the articles. ST36 was the most widely prescribed acupoint. Based on network meta-analysis, four outcome indicators were described, namely, acupuncture + medication ranked first in treating radiation enteritis, moxibustion + medication ranked first in preventing radiotherapy-induced leukopenia, acupuncture + medication ranked first in preventing radioactive oral mucositis, and acupuncture ranked first in improving the stimulated salivary flow rate of radioactive xerostomia. CONCLUSION: The findings of the network meta-analysis manifested that acupuncture therapy combined with medication has superiority in most RIAEs, both reducing incidence and relieving symptoms. However, high-quality studies are still needed to provide conclusive evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-7-0054/, identifier: INPLASY202070054.
Epistemonikos ID: 8932a60a015fe6daf90fe34e9f8715fd97ba1e28
First added on: Jan 03, 2023