Evaluation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life In Patients With Conventional Complete Dentures Versus Mini-Implant Retained Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The requested reference [3910554893f7a53bc9a8872025790265d0f1ae6c] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [a09c2851190f47023e24683b951d4bb7c6766310]

Authors
Category Primary study
Registry of TrialsClinicalTrials.gov
Year 2025
Mini-implants have emerged as a practical and less invasive solution for the rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles, offering reduced surgical complexity, lower cost, and faster healing compared to conventional implants. These advantages make them especially suitable for elderly patients or those with systemic health concerns or limited bone volume. Despite their growing clinical use, evidence from well-designed randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of mini-implant-retained overdentures on patients\' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is still scarce. Establishing this evidence is crucial for guiding treatment decisions in resource-constrained settings and improving the standard of care for edentulous individuals. This research aims to provide high-quality data on the effectiveness of mini-implants in improving OHRQoL, as measured by OHIP-14, compared to conventional dentures./
Epistemonikos ID: 83c422967ec90eab8a65b17e7c6ea11400e3c870
First added on: Jul 24, 2025