Re-evaluation of the system of acupuncture treatment of primary hypertensive disease

Objective To summarize the current systematic evaluation of acupuncture treatment of primary hypertensive disease, evaluate its methodological bias and its evidence-quality. Method Computer retrieves Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane library, CBM, CNKI and Wangfang Data. , retrieval time frame from building up to November 2016. using the system evaluation methodological quality assessment tool AMSTAR Evaluation, the quality of evidence for the main endings of the system evaluation using the GRAND system methodological evaluation methodology. The results were included in 14 systematic evaluations, 7 in Chinese literature, 7 in English. Documentation. Use of qualitative assessment of original research methodologies Risk of bias tool 9, 4 using the improved Jadad scale, 1 using the improved Oxford scale. AMSTAR tool evaluation results show that of the 11 entries that affect the methodological quality of the system evaluation methodology, whether entry 1 provides an upfront scheme”, entry 3" whether a comprehensive literature retrieval”, entry 4" published Status is considered in the inclusion criterion” and entry 10 “whether to assess the possibility of publishing bias” Existing methodological bias Maximum .GRAIN System Methodology assesses the main endgame indicators, both at low level or very low level. Conclusion Current acupuncture treatment of primary hypertensive disease has some efficacy, but its evidence quality level is lower and clinical Intermediate application of this evidence should be prudent.