An open randomized study using a skin protector spray made of acrylic terpolymers versus and standardized moisturizer in preventing acute radiodermatitis in patients with anal and rectal cancer

Patients' ongoing anal and rectal cancer radiotherapy exhibit a high prevalence of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation, impairing clinical, economic, and social outcomes. Clinical trials targeting product efficacy in preventing radiodermatitis are lacking in the current literature. These products could contribute to diminishing adverse effects, reducing equipment idle time by therapy interruption, and increasing the cure rate. Our goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of cutaneous spray based on acrylic terpolymers in preventing radiodermatitis with moist desquamation in patients with rectal or anal cancer. Spray effectiveness was defied against a standardized moisturizer in the institution made of Calendula officinalis L. and Aloe barbadensis extracts. An open, single-blind, randomized clinical study was conducted in a single institution, reference in national treatment in oncological diseases, with a sample size (n) of 63 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups: (i) experimental, using cutaneous protector spray; and (ii) control, using moisturizer Dnativ Revita Derm. RTOC's scale was used for evaluating skin condition. Data was collected in forms, which considered: (i) the primary outcome of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation occurrence; and (ii) the secondary outcome of radiotherapy interruption caused by radiodermatitis occurrence and severity, and product adverse effects. Analyses were performed by intention to treat and per protocol, using descriptive, analytical, and inferential statistics, with a significance level of ≤ 0.10 (α). Research was approved by the Ethics committee under approval nº 5.322.985 and registered in Clinical Trials under number NCT04067310T. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that patients exposed to cutaneous spray protector were less prone to develop radiodermatitis with moist desquamation compared to the control group. Absolute reduction in radiodermatitis risk was 18% in the experimental group. The radiodermatitis overall incidence was 100%, with 36.5% of higher severity. The incidence of grade 1 radiodermatitis was higher in the experimental group, while the more severe grades (3 and 4) had a higher incidence in the control group; 17.5% of the participants had an interruption of radiotherapy due to radiodermatitis, ranging from 3 to 15 days, with an average of six interrupted days. Despite being clinically relevant, these results regarding the temporary interruption of treatment and the severity of radiodermatitis were not statistically significant. Risk factors for moist desquamation were considered: female gender, diagnosis of C.21 and C.21.8, high radiation doses (5400 to 6000 cGy), histological type squamous cell carcinoma, humidity before and during radiotherapy, and use of intimate protection. In conclusion, the skin protector spray is an effective product in the prevention of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation in patients with anal and rectal cancer. In this sense, the results can guide the review of care protocols for the prevention of radiodermatitis used by nurses in the context of nursing consultations in radiotherapy to reduce the impacts on therapeutic follow-up and the quality of life of patients with cancer of the anal canal and straight.