Authors
»
Cresswell FV, Kitonsa J, Norcross C, Tumusiime V, Ombajo LA, Garrett N, Kassim S, Owarwo NC, Laker Odongpiny EA, Yawe I, Mahomed S, Mugerwa H, Kafeero PL, Nkuranga J, Bahemuka U, Nabbuto J, Ankunda V, Nabaggala P, Ogwang C, Kimbugwe G, Kakande A, Singh U, van der Vendt D, Onyango A, Koile E, Lawrence DS, Idahosa A, van Eygen V, Addo Boateng F, Eshun-Wilsonova I, Grint DJ, Ruzagira E, IMPALA Study Group -More
Category
»
Primary study
Journal»The New England journal of medicine
Year
»
2026
BACKGROUND: In eastern and southern Africa, approximately 1 million people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and receiving oral therapy do not have viral suppression because of adherence challenges. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial to compare long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine with oral dolutegravir-based therapy among adults with virally suppressed HIV type 1 (viral load, <200 copies per milliliter) and suboptimal adherence or care engagement. The participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intramuscular injections of cabotegravir (600 mg) plus rilpivirine (900 mg) every 8 weeks, with the first two injection visits occurring 4 weeks apart, or to continue daily oral dolutegravir-based therapy; baseline drug-resistance testing was not performed. The primary end point was a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter at week 48; noninferiority was assessed with a margin of -10 percentage points. Confirmed virologic failure (two consecutive viral loads of ≥200 copies per milliliter) was a key secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 540 participants were enrolled across seven sites in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda; 537 were included in the primary analysis. At 48 weeks, 244 of 268 participants (91.0%) in the long-acting-therapy group had a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter, as compared with 240 of 269 participants (89.2%) in the oral-therapy group (risk difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 6.9), which met the criterion for noninferiority. The results of a per-protocol analysis were consistent with those of the primary analysis. Confirmed virologic failure occurred in 5 participants (1.9%) in the long-acting-therapy group and in no participants in the oral-therapy group (risk difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.5). Serious adverse events were reported in 11 of 271 participants (4.1%) who received long-acting therapy and in 8 of 269 participants (3.0%) who received oral therapy (risk difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 4.2). CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with HIV in Africa who have adherence challenges, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine was noninferior to oral dolutegravir-based therapy for maintaining a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; IMPALA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05546242; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACT202301600757432TMC278LAHTX3005.). Copyright © 2026 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Epistemonikos ID: 72a9130c4403ad60104e127084325c3dd5639b18
First added on: Oct 15, 2026