Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty for Macular Corneal Dystrophy

The requested reference [b2e8a13c5192bf39bce6b6408cfd5bd4c745689b] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [f20c943a1a9525e76ee0572019a8fa38f4890e7a]

Authors
Category Primary study
Registry of TrialsISRCTN registry
Year 2013
INTERVENTION: Two different keratoplasty technique: Deep anterior lamellar keratopalsty vs Penetrating keratoplasty. CONDITION: Macular corneal dystrophy ; Eye Diseases ; Corneal scars and opacities PRIMARY OUTCOME: A complete ophthalmologic examination was performed before the operation and postoperative visit in both groups. The examination included logMAR uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), logMAR best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and corneal topographic analysis with the CSO topography system (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Firenze, Italy). Contrast sensitivity measurements and corneal aberrometric analysis were also performed postoperatively after all sutures were finally removed. The CSV‐1OOOE chart (VectorVision, Greenville, Ohio, USA) was used for the assessment of contrast sensitivity. This test consists of four rows of sinewave gratings (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles/degree) that had to be observed by the patient with full correction in place at a distance of 2.5 m. After an initial demonstration, the contrast threshold was measured for each spatial frequency. All patients were tested under both mesopic and photopic conditions and the results were expressed in log units of contrast sensitivity. Corneal aberrometry was recorded and analyzed with the CSO topography system whose software automatically converts the corneal elevation profile into corneal wavefront data using Zernike polynomials with an expansion up to the 7th order. The corneal aberration coefficients and root mean square (RMS) values were calculated for a 6.0 mm pupil. ; ECD of donor corneas were assessed by a specular microscope before storage in Optisol medium. The endothelium was photographed and evaluated using a Topcon SP 2000p noncontact specular microscope (Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Images of the central corneal window were reviewed by the same observer (E. S.) and manual correction of the cell borders was performed before final analysis of the endothelium. Twenty endothelial cells were marked for each analysis. For each examination, three measurements of ECD were averaged. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Surgical complications INCLUSION CRITERIA: Male and female patients aged between 16 and 67 requiring keratoplasty for the treatment of macular corneal dystrophy without endothelial involvement were included.
Epistemonikos ID: 5e32b5345c8bc8a9b425809df5432d007cb1817c
First added on: Aug 22, 2024