Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

Authors
Category Primary study
JournalSURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES
Year 2012
This prospective randomized study compared single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with respect to estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain levels, and complications. Thirty-four study patients were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients underwent SILC and 17 underwent LC. Operative time was longer for SILC than for LC, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the relationship of body mass index with operative time between SILC and LC (P = 0.613, P = 0.983, respectively). The 2 groups had no statistically significant differences with respect to visual analog scale scores, estimated blood loss, shoulder pain, or complications (P > 0.05). SILC can be the treatment of choice for gallbladder disease. Although the surgeon's first several attempts at SILC require a longer operative time compared with LC, there are no differences in hospital length of stay, blood loss, complication rates, or pain scores between SILC and LC.
Epistemonikos ID: 52aeab4a04828e1cac38967e6e767d4e00d0aa7b
First added on: Oct 31, 2013