Authors
»
University of Canberra -More
Category
»
Primary study
Registry of Trials»ANZCTR
Year
»
2019
INTERVENTION: Test group‐ treatment of tungiasis with a 5% (v/w), proprietary tea tree oil (TTO) gel The feet of the participants will be washed with water and non‐medicated soap, dried with a clean towel, and the participants’ toenails will be clipped to enable easier application of the test medication. Then, the test medication will be applied twice daily on days 1, 4 and 7 by trained study personnel (concerned case officers from participating schools). The mode of administration of the test medication is by taking the required amount of the gel on the palms (up to 8g/day) and spreading it over the infested skin areas until it provides a full coverage of the affected area (skin surface of the feet up to the ankle) and the feet will then be left for 15 minutes to allow the medication to dry. CONDITION: Infection ‐ Other infectious diseases Public Health ‐ Other public health Skin ‐ Dermatological conditions Tungiasis (sand flea disease) ; ; Tungiasis (sand flea disease) PRIMARY OUTCOME: Proportion of non‐viable fleas ; ; Determination of viability of the sand flea lesions will be performed using a handheld digital video microscope, assisted with pictorial flipcharts. Expulsion of eggs, excretion of faecal threads, excretion of faecal liquid, and pulsations/contractions in the abdomen of the embedded flea will be considered as four viability signs and lesions with 2 out of 4 viability signs will be recorded viable. Lesions will be considered dead (non‐viable) if their viability signs are not detected during the 10 min follow‐up examinations. Differences in the proportion of non‐viable lesions between test and control groups will be compared and presented with their respective confidence intervals at 95% and p‐values. [Day 10 (9 days after the first treatment).] SECONDARY OUTCOME: Acute morbidity evaluation ; ; The severity score for acute morbidities (SSAT; which includes typical signs of local inflammation, the presence of suppuration, ulcers and fissures) will be assessed using a validated scoring system designed for tungiasis morbidity assessment. ; In addition to SSAT, a visual analogue scale (VAS) called the ‘Itch‐man scale’‐‐ a 5‐point pictorial Likert scale, validated for paediatric burn survivors, will be adopted to evaluate itching. Finally, a 4 point pictorial scale, validated in paediatric tungiasis patients will be adopted to assess the pain, as well as pain‐related and itching related sleep disturbances (QoL assessment). ; [Days 0 (baseline), 5 and 10 (post treatment)] Participant acceptability of the trial intervention/s ; ; Participants/caregivers will be asked to rate the acceptability of the treatment in terms of effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and overall satisfaction on a 0‐5 visual analogue scale. [Day 10 (9 days after the first treatment). ; ; ] Proportion of participants with side effects (adverse events) ; ; ; ] INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Children aged 6‐15 years with at least 1 viable (stage II and Stage III) lesions according to the Fortaleza classification and a maximum of 2 viable sand flea lesions will be targeted. 2. Children whose legal guardians are willing to give informed written consents after having been oral and written informed about benefits and potential risks of the trial ; Safety will be assessed through evaluation of treatment related adverse events and skin irritation. Participants/caregivers (in person or on the phone) will be asked about the occurrence of any solicited or unsolicited adverse reactions to the treatment during each follow‐up visit. The trial team (clinical officer and health officers) will also carefully follow‐up the trial participants on a regular basis at the trial site, until the end of trial period. This will be done using a pre‐specified list of possible AEs, including local adverse reactions (swelling, stinging/burning, itching, induration, erythema) and systemic adverse reactions (fever, nausea and headache). Caregivers of participants will also be given a diary card to record ongoing solicited adverse events. The severity of the adverse events will be categorized as mild, moderate and severe according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 guideline[Days 1 (PM), 4, 5, 7 and 10 (post‐treatment)
Epistemonikos ID: 4ed0b61a7df2b6b681ecf797a45b9c0ca95ad091
First added on: Aug 24, 2024