Meta analysis of the clinical efficacy of acupuncture versus drug treatment of renal colic

Machine translation Machine translation
Authors
Category Systematic review
Journal中国中西医结合外科杂志
Year 2020
Objective: Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of acupuncture versus drug treatment of renal colic. Method: Retrieving literature published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EmBase, China Biomedical Biological Database (CBM), CNKI, VIP (VIP) and Wanfang Database from May 2018. Therapeutic renal colic of the randomized controlled trial study, extracting relevant information and using the Cochrane System Evaluation Manual 5.1, Meta analysis using the Revman Manager 5.3 software. Results: 13 literature met the criteria for inclusion and included a total of 1131 patients.Meta analysis results tip: Compared to the control group, there were always pain relief in the acupuncture group. Efficient [ RR=1.12,95% CI (1.06,1.17), P<0.001], and acupuncture can shorten the time of pain start relief [MD=-9.92,95% CI (-12.85, -8.10), P<0.001]; but there is no statistical difference in VAS score after treatment between the two groups. Conclusion: Acupuncture treatment with renal colic and Therapy Compared to, the efficacy is still substantial , simple operation and relatively few adverse reactions are worthy of broad clinical outreach, but more clinical randomized controlled trials are still required to validate the above conclusions, subject to the quantitative and qualitative limitations of the inclusion of studies.
Epistemonikos ID: 4857b282193581c2701f0534d74df61acaec2dc1
First added on: Aug 10, 2020
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: 中文

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use