Meta Analysis on the Clinical Efficacy of Push and Its Combination Therapy in Treatment of Simplex Obesity

Objective: Evaluate the clinical efficacy of PUMED and its combination therapies for the treatment of mere obesity, analyse the current state of clinical research, provide reference and assistance for clinical treatment and related research. VIP Journal Database (VIP), Universal database to collect the literature of clinical randomized controlled trials for the treatment of simplex obesity from 2000 to 2015 and Meta analysis using the RevMan 5.3 software for inclusion results: 11 literature meets the criteria for inclusion, a total of 695 patients .10 RCT literature with efficiency as the main outcome indicator, strong homogeneity of research conducted by Meta analysis, showing that Comparing with other therapies, after combination OR=1.92,95% CI [1.21,3.03]. Overall effect test, Z=2.79, P′ 0.01, difference in efficacy of both were statistically significant in the treatment of mere obesity; tolla was statistically significant in comparison of ear crust pressure therapy, body mass. [merge WMD (fixed effect model) =- 5.32,95% CI (-7.55, -3.10), P0.00001], P0.00001], and the difference between the group comparison between tulna and needle spines alone [Combined WMD (Fixed Effect Model) = -5.76,95% CI (-6.28, -5.25), P0.00001]. Comparative differences have statistics Significance [Combined WMD (Fixed Effect Model) = -1.17,95% CI (-1.72, -0.62), P≈ 0.0001]; Stretch versus Chinese medicine therapy, BMI differences are statistically significant [Combined WMD (Fixed Effect Model) = -1.20,95% CI (-1.82, -0.0058), P=0.0058 01 → 0.01] ; tolla combined acupuncture for acupuncture therapy alone, BMI is statistically significant [Combined WMD (Fixed Effect Model) = -1.56,95% CI (-1.70, -1.41), P≈ 0.00001]. Conclusion: Based on a rational diet and appropriate exercise, the treatment of pure obesity is safe and effective, Can be better than ear pressure and drug therapy, combined with The efficacy of push therapy is superior to the use of a single weight loss method. More high-quality randomized controlled studies are required due to the limited number of incorporation and low quality of the literature.