Systematic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Peripheral Surface Efficacy of Needle Treatment/MetA Analysis

Objective Application of AMSTAR Statement to Evaluate Systematic Evaluation of Surround Surface Palsy Therapeutic/Meta Analysis Documentation Methodological Quality of Methodology Application Computer Retrieval Includes Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CJFD), Chongqing Wip Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Knowledge Database (CNKI), China Sheng) Physical Medical Documentation Database Web Edition (CBM Web Version), Everywhere Database (WangFang Data) and major national and foreign databases of Chinese medicine journals (TCM), Pubmed database, ISI Web of Knowledge database, retrieving time frame from building up to 31 December 2015. The 11 entries in the AMSTAR statement list carried out a report quality analysis of all systems evaluation literature incorporated. The results were eventually included in 14 research literature, including 9 systematic evaluations, 2 meta analyses, 3 meta analyses and meta analyses. program and registration, collection of literature, incorporation of exclusion criteria, Veracity evaluation, data processing and fund support. Conclusion The application of the AMSTAR statement to evaluate the methodological quality of the system of peripheral acupuncture treatment and meta analysis seriously affected the authenticity of the article and showed that the current system review had varying degrees of deficiencies at all points of the trial report., which provides limited credibility of evidence, which may obscure the true nature of the research measures efficacy and accuracy, calling into question their credibility. Caution is needed in applying results.