Comparing the clinical outcomes of a APRF and IPRF when placed with dental implants in anterior tooth region

INTERVENTION: Intervention1: APRF: To compare the bone healing and soft tissue changes around implants placed with APRF Intervention2: IPRF: To compare the bone healing and soft tissue changes around implants placed with IPRF Control Intervention1: NO‐PRF: To compare APRF IPRF and implants placed without PRF CONDITION: PRIMARY OUTCOME: Comparative evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes around dental implants placed with A‐PRF, i‐PRF, and without PRF, assessed at and at 2, 3, and 6 months post‐surgery.Timepoint: 2, 3, and 6 months post‐surgery. SECONDARY OUTCOME: The secondary outcome will be to assess the effect of A‐PRF & i‐PRF on peri‐implant soft tissue healing, implant stability, & overall implant success compared with implants placed without PRF during the 6‐month follow‐up period.Timepoint: 6‐month follow‐up period. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with loss of anterior teeth requiring rehabilitation using dental implant. Adequate bone volume for dental implant placement classified as D2 and D3 as determined by preoperative radiographs or CBCT scans. Systemically healthy individuals. Patients who are willing to give informed consent.