Meta analysis of thermosensitive acupuncture in the treatment of chronic prostatitis

Objective: Systematic evaluation of the safety and efficacy of thermal acupuncture in the treatment of chronic prostatitis (CP). Method: Electronic retrieval of the universal data medical information system, the full text database of Chinese journals, the Wip information resource system, the Chinese biomedical literature database, PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, BIOSIS Preview, the literature of thermal acupuncture treatment CP, retrieval years January 1, 1979 to June 10, 2015, evaluation by Jadad Scale Contains the quality of the literature, Meta analysis with RevMan 5. 2 software. Results: 7 of the literature, of which 3 of the high-quality literature, not reported on the side reaction; the cure rate of thermosensitive acupuncture is significantly higher than that of Western medicine, thermo-acupuncture (P^0.05), thermosensitive upuncture and RF, thermo-sensitive upuncture + RF and traditional upuncture, thermoupuncture and traditional upuncture and enema There is no significant difference in the rate of increase (P−0. 05); Thermal and Temperature acupuncture, Thermal acupuncture + RF and RF, Thermal Upuncture + RF and Traditional Upuncture + RF, Thermal Upuncture + Enema and Conventional Upuncture are all significantly higher than the latter (P^0. 05 or P^0. 01), Thermal Upuncture and Traditional Upuncture are not significantly different in Efficiency (P^0. 05); Improvement of NIH - CCSI, Thermal Acupuncture & Western Medicine, Thermal & Temperature Acupuncture, Thermal Upuncture + RF & RF, Heat Sensitive upuncture+RF and traditional upuncture+RF, thermal upuncture+enema and traditional upuncture+enema are significantly better than the latter (P 0. 01), thermosensitive upuncture and traditional upuncture+enema are significantly better than the latter (P. 0. 05). In the latter (P^0.05 or P ^0.01), thermosensitive acupuncture compared to traditional acupuncture The difference is not significant (P -> 0. 05); the improvement in EPS-WBC is significantly better than the traditional upuncture + enema (P^0. 01), the difference between thermosensitive and western medicine is not significant (P^0. 05). Conclusion: Thermal acupuncture treatment CP is high quality, application safety, thermal acupuncture in improving NIH-CPSI, improving cure rate, combined with other therapies can improve efficacy, single use overall efficacy is comparable to Western medicine and traditional acupuncture.