Meta analysis of Needles for the treatment of cervical vertebrae disease

Machine translation Machine translation

The requested reference [13cb904dc562a5dfb008e961f85b96bfe9ae805a] no longer exists in our database. It has been replaced by the current reference: [c67c4d86e023960b324671a7c74a9a936bb57ef4]

Authors
Category Systematic review
Journal医学综述
Year 2016
Objective To explore the efficacy of a needle knife in the treatment of cervical cervical disease (CSA) and conduct meta analysis. Methods Retrieving PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full Text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-Text Database published or unpublished clinical randomized controlled trials of Needle Knife Therapeutics CSA from Cochrane Collaborative Network to November 2014 Random Meta analysis conducted by controlled trials. Each screening of the literature and the Jadad score performed was conducted independently by 2 researchers, resolved through consultation or consulted by third parties when opinions were not uniform. The result was 6 high-quality randomized controlled literature included in Meta analysis, with a total number of cases included in 409. Meta analysis showed statistically significant differences in the total cure rate of CSA applied with needle-cutter intervention versus the efficacy of needling or western drugs (OR = 1.78,95% CI 1.15~2.75; I2 = 48%, P=0.05). Conclusion The cure rate of CSA for needle-cutter treatment has a clear superiority over the cure rate of acupuncture or western medicine (fluorirazine).
Epistemonikos ID: 1767ce048d64339de77884a64cfe06c586887a32
First added on: Aug 10, 2020
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: 中文

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use