Neuromodulation for Subjective Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Authors
Category Systematic review
JournalLaryngoscope
Year 2026
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neuromodulation and bimodal stimulation for chronic subjective tinnitus in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE (January 2015–December 2025) searched per PRISMA 2020. Review Methods: Adult RCTs (≥ 18 years) with chronic subjective tinnitus (> 3 months) assessing validated outcomes (THI, TFI, TQ) for neuromodulation/bimodal interventions vs. sham/controls. Two-stage screening, Cochrane RoB-2 risk-of-bias assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses (REML) were performed when ≥ 3 comparable trials were available; effects reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. Main Outcomes and measures included change in tinnitus severity (THI/TFI/TQ) while secondary outcomes included loudness (VAS/NRS), durability, and adverse events. Results: Twenty-six RCTs (n = 1576) met criteria: tES (11; n = 372), rTMS (8; n = 432), acoustic coordinated reset (1; n = 100), vagus nerve stimulation (2; n = 90), and bimodal stimulation (4; n = 582). Meta-analysis showed a nonsignificant pooled effect for tDCS (SMD −0.36; 95% CI −0.75 to 0.02; I2 = 51%) and rTMS (SMD −0.15; 95% CI −0.37 to 0.07; I2 = 0%). Single-trial evidence for coordinated reset showed no advantage over broadband noise. VNS demonstrated modest benefits with safety concerns limited to implanted approaches. Bimodal stimulation yielded consistent, clinically meaningful reductions (often ≥ 10–20 points on THI/TFI), with durability up to 12 months. Adverse events were mild/transient across noninvasive modalities. Conclusions: Noninvasive neuromodulation appears safe with average benefits; among modalities, bimodal stimulation shows the most consistent and durable clinical improvements. Standardized, adequately powered RCTs with harmonized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to refine targets and dosing. Level of Evidence: 1. © 2026 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Epistemonikos ID: 16295b7e0803138e43fc81b10e912143631c0c5b
First added on: May 22, 2026