Minimally Invasive Umbilical Ileostomy Versus Traditional Ileostomy - A Randomised control study targeting patient quality of life

INTERVENTION: Intervention ‐ Ileostomy through umbilicus instead of through a standard right lower quadrant position. This will be performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon. This will be performed one at the time of their surgery, usually as a defunctioning stoma for a bowel resection. This will be performed in a standard operating theatre, the only difference being the site of stoma placement, each patient would be receiving an ileostomy regardless of which group they are randomised to. They will be followed up during their hospital admission and in outpatient department following their discharge. A one of quality of life questionaire will be performed after one month to compare impacts of stoma placement on quality of life. CONDITION: Ileostomy PRIMARY OUTCOME: Stoma‐QOL ‐ A quality of life questionnaire for people with ostomy ; ‐ Validated Quality of life questionnaire ; ‐ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274339/ SECONDARY OUTCOME: Stoma related adverse events, examples include ; ‐ Parastomal hernia ‐ clinical examination within routine clinic follow up ; ‐ Stoma prolapse ‐ clinical examination within routine clinic follow up ; ‐ Skin excoriation ‐ clinical examination within routine clinic follow up ; ‐ Stoma leakage ‐ clinical examination within routine clinic follow up INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients deemed fit for surgical intervention, no difference between patients, just position of stoma formation.