Efficacy of different solvents in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals: A micro-computed tomography study

Not yet translated Not yet translated
Category Primary study
JournalAustralian Endodontic Journal
Year 2014
Loading references information
Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the root filling material that remained after retreatment of curved root canals with chloroform and Endosolv R as solvents. The evaluation employed micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging. Thirty-six extracted molar teeth with curved roots were selected. After preparation with ProTaper rotary instruments, the canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to solvent used (n?=?12) as follows: group 1: chloroform; group 2: Endosolv R; group 3: no solvent (negative control). ProTaper Universal Retreatment files were used to remove each root canal filling and then the self-adjusting file was applied for two minutes. Preoperative and postoperative micro-CT images were used to assess the percentage of residual filling material. The mean percentage of residual filling material was quantified. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of percentage volume of residual root canal filling.
Epistemonikos ID: d73e63097bfcfcbac6aa8c26ca585cafe0207d5c
First added on: Aug 23, 2020